The DICKSHARK DVD is going to contain the FRANKENSHARK cutm so if you want the first commerical cut (2 hours and 20 minutes) this is your last chance. Stock is low. The Frankenshark cut is 90 minutes and shall become the official DVD version.

The FRANKENSHARK Blu(e)ray is going to be discontinued, so get your copy if you want it in your collection. This also contains a shorter version of SANTA CLAUS: A HORROR STORY.

You might be aware that there will be a special Blu(e)ray version of Dickshark coming out this year. It will contain the longest possible version, which might exceed six hours, as well as the best possible edit which shouldn’t be much longer than an hour and a half, but it is too early to tell. As of this writing, the process is only 25% complete, as far as scenes to be edited, and the longest cut is at 90 minutes and the shortest is 20 minutes. This ratio will increase because, so far, only the dialogue scenes are being stitched together. The fans who supported the idea of a longest-possible-version wanted to see their favorite actresses in extremely extended versions, especially Misty Mundae, so her 20-minute clip might actually run an hour and a half or more.

The Blu(e)ray will also contain at least two hours of behind-the-scenes, and it might contain deleted shots. It’s still being actively edited, with unknown duration of the longest version, so stay tuned for more announcements.

The shortest version will be available for streaming on Bill Zebub’s vimeo channel first, and it may become available for other digital merchants. Much of the graphic nudity has to be cut because American merchants are imbeciles, and the environment in America is anti-intellectual and superstitious. Nudity is equated with sickness rather than something to be adored, and certainly, a healthy person reacts favorably to beauty. Americans are either pathological (shunning beauty and denying their natural inclinations) or they PUBLICLY express revulsion. Add to this retardation the fear that digital merchants have of being attacked by their fellow imbeciles.

The irony is that Bill Zebub wove philosophy into the movie, to combine the lofty with the visceral. Perhaps some immature people consider nudity to be low-brow, but that is a facade, and it is not true. Why not celebrate the architecture of nature?

Is it not ridiculous that nudity, or even sex, repulses some people? Why? It seems that such people give no worth to things that should be celebrated. When these people touch their mates, is it with shame, regret, and self-loathing? THAT is what is sick, not what is on the screen.